or analyse a relationship
46 incidents · 67 responses 0 threat actors
Years
Records matching “cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency”
Analyse
113 results for “Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency” 46 incidents · 67 responses
Threat Actor 1 United States ·Government & politics Unnamed APT group exploited Progress Telerik vulnerability to infiltrate US government agency alongside other threat actors beginning in August 2022 1 Aug 2022
Incident · Low severity 1 Aug 2022
Threat Actor 1 United States ·Government & politics
Unnamed APT group exploited Progress Telerik vulnerability to infiltrate US government agency alongside other threat actors beginning in August 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency North Korean state-sponsored cyber actors US Officials Released Joint Cybersecurity Advisory in Response to North Korean State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Using Maui Ransomware to Target Health Sectro, 6 July 2022 Technical disclosure 6 Jul 2022
Technical disclosure 6 Jul 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency North Korean state-sponsored cyber actors
US Officials Released Joint Cybersecurity Advisory in Response to North Korean State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Using Maui Ransomware to Target Health Sectro, 6 July 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-s… US CISA, NSA, and FBI Released a Joint Cybersecurity Advisory in Response to People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors on 7 June 2022 Technical disclosure 7 Jun 2022
Technical disclosure 7 Jun 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-s…
US CISA, NSA, and FBI Released a Joint Cybersecurity Advisory in Response to People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors on 7 June 2022
Unknown United States ·Government & politics Unknown actors gained access to networks of at least two organizations of the US Federal Civilian Executive Branch through the malicious use of legitimate remote monitoring and management software in mid-June and mid-September 2022 1 Jun 2022
Incident · Low severity 1 Jun 2022
Unknown United States ·Government & politics
Unknown actors gained access to networks of at least two organizations of the US Federal Civilian Executive Branch through the malicious use of legitimate remote monitoring and management software in mid-June and mid-September 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Karakurt US Government Issues Joint Advisory on Karakurt Data Extortion Group Activity on 1 June 2022 Technical disclosure 1 Jun 2022
Technical disclosure 1 Jun 2022
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Karakurt
US Government Issues Joint Advisory on Karakurt Data Extortion Group Activity on 1 June 2022
ITNational Cybersecurity Agency Italy Italian Government Officials and CSIRT-ITA Published Bulletin on DDoS Attacks Targeting National and International Sites, 11 May 2022 Technical disclosure 11 May 2022
Technical disclosure 11 May 2022
ITNational Cybersecurity Agency Italy
Italian Government Officials and CSIRT-ITA Published Bulletin on DDoS Attacks Targeting National and International Sites, 11 May 2022
Showing 73–78 of 113 Prev Page 13 / 19 Next
How to read the ledger Every row is an incident or a response. Shape tells them apart; colour and the marks below each sigil carry the rest.
Row type
Incident — a square sigil. The connected dots below carry attribution.
Response — a round sigil. The two squares below show its anchors.
Incident types
Data theft
Disruption
Hijacking
Ransomware & extortion
Response types
Official policy
Unofficial policy
Criminal proceedings
Technical disclosure
Operational action
Reading the marks
Attribution dots (incidents) — how firmly an initiator is named; both filled and joined navy when fully attributed.
none one both
Weight squares (responses) — anchors present: left = a linked incident, right = a named actor.
0 1 2
Issuer stack — one chip is a single issuer; a stack of ISO codes marks a joint or coordinated response.
EUsingle DEFRNL+5several states

An independent, interdisciplinary research consortium providing evidence-based analysis of cyber incidents and the political and legal responses to them.

A consortium of

Heidelberg University · Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)

© 2026 European Repository of Cyber Incidents Evidence-based analysis of cyber incidents & responses
Search