Data Spaces
or analyse a relationship
46 incidents · 67 responses 0 threat actors
Years
Records matching “cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency”
Analyse
113 results for “Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency” 46 incidents · 67 responses
DKDanish Civil Protection Agency Pro-Russian hacker groups (Russian Federation) Danish SAMSIK Issued Warning of Heightened Threat From Destructive Cyber Attacks by Russian State-Sponsored Hackers on 30 June 2026 Official policy 30 Jun 2026
Official policy 30 Jun 2026
DKDanish Civil Protection Agency Pro-Russian hacker groups (Russian Federation)
Danish SAMSIK Issued Warning of Heightened Threat From Destructive Cyber Attacks by Russian State-Sponsored Hackers on 30 June 2026
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Global (region) US CISA Issued an Alert on Hardening Compromised Fortinet Devices after Reports of Credential Exposures, 22 June 2026 Technical disclosure 22 Jun 2026
Technical disclosure 22 Jun 2026
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Global (region)
US CISA Issued an Alert on Hardening Compromised Fortinet Devices after Reports of Credential Exposures, 22 June 2026
AUNZGBUS+15 statesjoint Five Eyes Cyber Security Agencies Issued Joint Statement on AI-Driven Cyber Threats on 22 June 2026 Official policy 22 Jun 2026
Official policy 22 Jun 2026
AUNZGBUS+15 states
Five Eyes Cyber Security Agencies Issued Joint Statement on AI-Driven Cyber Threats on 22 June 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Conducted a Cyber Exercise to Test Response to Attacks on Rail and Maritime Networks on 10 and 11 June 2026 Operational action 11 Jun 2026
Operational action 11 Jun 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity
EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Conducted a Cyber Exercise to Test Response to Attacks on Rail and Maritime Networks on 10 and 11 June 2026
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency unattributed cyber threat actors US NSA, CISA and Partners Released Guidance on Hardening Automatic Tank Gauge Systems on 3 June 2026 Technical disclosure 3 Jun 2026
Technical disclosure 3 Jun 2026
USCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency unattributed cyber threat actors
US NSA, CISA and Partners Released Guidance on Hardening Automatic Tank Gauge Systems on 3 June 2026
CZJP2 statescoordinated Czech Republic and Japan Held Bilateral Talks on Cybersecurity Cooperation on 1 June 2026 Official policy 1 Jun 2026
Official policy 1 Jun 2026
CZJP2 states
Czech Republic and Japan Held Bilateral Talks on Cybersecurity Cooperation on 1 June 2026
Showing 1–6 of 113 Prev Page 1 / 19 Next
How to read the ledger Every row is an incident or a response. Shape tells them apart; colour and the marks below each sigil carry the rest.
Row type
Incident — a square sigil. The connected dots below carry attribution.
Response — a round sigil. The two squares below show its anchors.
Incident types
Data theft
Disruption
Hijacking
Ransomware & extortion
Response types
Official policy
Unofficial policy
Criminal proceedings
Technical disclosure
Operational action
Reading the marks
Attribution dots (incidents) — how firmly an initiator is named; both filled and joined navy when fully attributed.
none one both
Weight squares (responses) — anchors present: left = a linked incident, right = a named actor.
0 1 2
Issuer stack — one chip is a single issuer; a stack of ISO codes marks a joint or coordinated response.
EUsingle DEFRNL+5several states

An independent, interdisciplinary research consortium providing evidence-based analysis of cyber incidents and the political and legal responses to them.

A consortium of

Heidelberg University · Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)

Data spaces

Reference

Project

© 2026 European Repository of Cyber Incidents Evidence-based analysis of cyber incidents & responses
Search